{"id":13863,"date":"2020-09-10T09:35:58","date_gmt":"2020-09-10T13:35:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/chimeraobscura.com\/vm\/?p=13863"},"modified":"2020-09-10T09:38:18","modified_gmt":"2020-09-10T13:38:18","slug":"episode-397-daniel-mendelsohn","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chimeraobscura.com\/vm\/episode-397-daniel-mendelsohn","title":{"rendered":"Episode 397 – Daniel Mendelsohn"},"content":{"rendered":"

Virtual Memories Show 397: Daniel Mendelsohn<\/a><\/p>\n

https:\/\/traffic.libsyn.com\/secure\/virtualmemories\/Episode_397_-_Daniel_Mendelsohn.mp3<\/a><\/audio><\/div>

Podcast: Play in new window<\/a> | Download<\/a><\/p>

Subscribe: Spotify<\/a> | TuneIn<\/a> | RSS<\/a> | More<\/a><\/p>\n

“Each of my four books is secretly exploring a genre: lyric, epic, novel, and I’m not even sure what this one is, but I wrote it entirely to please myself.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/a>With Three Rings: A Tale of Exile, Narrative, and Fate<\/a> (UVA Press), Daniel Mendelsohn<\/a> has written one of my favorite books of 2020. We get into Homer’s use of Ring Composition and how it shapes Three Rings<\/em>, how this book grew out of his experience writing An Odyssey<\/a>, why he chose Fran\u00e7ois F\u00e9nelon, Eric Auerbach, and WG Sebald as the three exiled subjects of his book, and how we understand the relationship between “what happened” and “the story of what happened” (that is, how narration changes the nature of facts). We also get into how he managed to compress and capture just about all of his major themes in his briefest book, why Auerbach disliked ring composition, and what it says about Homeric vs. Hebrew \u2014 or optimistic vs. pessimistic \u2014 styles of story, how every story has more stories embedded in it, and why Istanbul may serve as the fusion of Athens & Jerusalem. We also get into Daniel’s pandemic experience and coping mechanisms for anxiety and dread, his mom’s involvement in Ken Burns’ upcoming documentary about the Holocaust in America, why translation is like a crossword puzzle for him, the negatives of focusing on STEM to the detriment of the liberal arts, and how we can both relate to Auerbach’s comment, \u201cIf it had been possible for me to acquaint myself with all the work that has been done on so many subjects, I might have never reached the point of writing.\u201d Give it a listen!<\/a> And go read Three Rings<\/a>! (& check out our previous conversation<\/a>!)<\/em><\/p>\n

“I was very attracted to the idea of the way in which their own wandering lives ended up being analogs for the narratives they ended up being interested in.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n