{"id":5089,"date":"2010-03-13T21:55:03","date_gmt":"2010-03-14T03:55:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/chimeraobscura.com\/vm\/?p=5089"},"modified":"2010-03-15T09:57:54","modified_gmt":"2010-03-15T14:57:54","slug":"exorcism-weekend","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chimeraobscura.com\/vm\/exorcism-weekend","title":{"rendered":"Exorcism Weekend"},"content":{"rendered":"

If a man cannot forget, he will never amount to much.<\/p>\n

–Soren Kierkegaard<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Ever wonder where all those Unrequired Reading links come from? I use NetNewsWire<\/a> for my RSS reader. It helps me keep track of 150+ RSS feeds, and has its own browser for feeds that I want to click through. The problem is, I have a tendency to save tabs “for later”, and there are presently more than 60 browser windows<\/em> open in the program.<\/p>\n

I save some pages for my own edification, not necessarily for posting. Still, I have a feeling all these tabs are starting to impair my computer’s ability to keep me happy, so I’ve decided to thin out the ranks today. After all, there are also more than 800 unread items<\/em> in the feed. That’s about two days’ accumulation of feeds. I’ll zap through some of them en masse, but read some of the others pretty intently.<\/p>\n

So let’s go through a whole ton of links that I meant to write about, but never got around to and likely never will! I’ll even share the “just for me” links, goofy as they are! (I thought about writing this as 88 Lines about 44 Links<\/a>\"\", but didn’t think I’d be able to make it all rhyme; sorry.)<\/p>\n

Orwell<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

I meant to write a whole lot about George Orwell, and that’s why the following links have been sitting in my tabs for so darned long.<\/em><\/p>\n

The Masterpiece That Killed George Orwell<\/a> – Orwell’s last days on Jura, writing 1984. (5\/10\/09)<\/p>\n

Oxford Literary Festival: George Orwell’s son speaks for the first time about his father<\/a> – Richard Blair was only 6 when his adoptive dad died, but he liked life on Jura. (3\/15\/09)<\/p>\n

TS Eliot\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s snort of rejection for Animal Farm<\/a> – Ha-ha! You were wrong, Tough Shit! (3\/29\/09)<\/p>\n

A Fine Rage<\/a> – James Wood on Orwell. I haven’t read this yet; the link is only for an abstract, and I’m not a New Yorker<\/em> subscriber, so I gotta hit the library sometime and find the original. Sure sounds interesting, and it’s got a great Ralph Steadman illo of Orwell. (4\/13\/09)<\/p>\n

Eternal Vigilance<\/a> – Keith Gessen on Orwell’s essays, eventually getting around to the problematic nature of my favorite one: Inside the Whale<\/a>. (5\/28\/09)<\/p>\n

Bumming Smokes in Paris and London: George Orwell\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Obsession with Tobacco<\/a> – I once argued that the real horror of 1984<\/em> isn’t the rats in a cage or the police busting down the door, but rather the dull razor blades and the cigarettes that fall apart. This PopMatters article may cover that, but it’s SEVEN PAGES LONG<\/em> and the single-page version is poorly formatted and won’t resize in my browser. So I’ll never know. (6\/19\/09)<\/p>\n

Curse Ye, Orwell!<\/a> – I hadn’t gotten around to reading this Popmatters article about the limitations of Orwell’s Why I Write<\/a> essay till now, but it strikes me that the author takes Orwell’s writing as far too canonical and literal. Pfeh. (1\/22\/10)<\/p>\n

Libraries<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

I wanted to write about the thinning out of my library. I had some thoughts about the process of admitting that there are books you will never get around to reading, a theme I hit on before, and how my tastes and interests have changed.<\/em><\/p>\n

Shelf Life<\/a> – William H. Gass on his library. (12\/07)<\/p>\n

Longing for Great Lost Works<\/a> – Stephen Marche on the (maybe) wonderful books, plays and poems that were lost. Sorta like all the blog-posts I abandoned, right? (4\/18\/09)<\/p>\n

Books do furnish a life<\/a> – Roger Ebert on the books that mount up in his office library. (10\/5\/09)<\/p>\n

Antilibraries<\/a> – Jason Kottke on Nassim Nicholas Taleb on Umberto Eco on how the books we haven’t read menace us. (6\/1\/09)<\/p>\n

2009 Commencement Address by Daniel Mendelsohn<\/a> – Beautiful story about why we read the classics, which would’ve helped (in part) with my justification for tossing many contemporary\/ephemeral books from my library. (5\/15\/09)<\/p>\n

Middlebrow Messiahs<\/a> – A review of a book about the history of the Great Books as a commercial concept. The book is uncharitable toward St. John’s College, where I went to grad school, but the reviewer takes the writer to task for that. (1\/16\/09)<\/p>\n

Confessions of a Middlebrow Professor<\/a> – Here’s another essay inspired by that book and the idea of middlebrow culture striving for intellectual achievement. Obviously, I was going to write some sort of essay about my time at St. John’s around this. (10\/5\/09)<\/p>\n

The Arcadia Fire<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Speaking of the classics, destroying libraries, and the conversation with the past, I really wanted to write about Tom Stoppard’s play Arcadia<\/a>\"\". I may still. Here are the first few paragraphs of an abortive attempt:<\/em><\/p>\n

I’ve written before about my evolving relationship with works of art (mainly books, movies and music) and their touchstone-y nature in my life. I think my best take on it was my year-end post in 2008<\/a> — I’ve written plenty on works that meant a lot to me once upon a time, but make me cringe now, as well as works that have grown in my estimation over the years.<\/p>\n

Sometimes I think I’ve neglected to tell you about the works that have retained their importance to me all these years. Partly it’s because of how familiar I am with them, how much they’ve come to inform who I am and how I understand things. Partly it’s because I’m afraid that I’ll fail to do them justice, that I’ll come up short in my descriptions of them and their importance.<\/p>\n

I could give you a list of books that have stuck with me all this time, beginning with Orwell’s essays and Miller’s Tropic of Cancer<\/em>, and it’d be a nice counterweight to my 0-fer series, where I celebrate all the lacunae in my reading universe.<\/p>\n

Which brings me to Arcadia<\/em>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Eh. Here are some of the links that would’ve woven into the piece.<\/em><\/p>\n

Et In Arcadia<\/a> – Mark Sarvas of The Elegant Variaion<\/em> kicked things off for me by noting two revivals of Arcadia<\/em> in D.C. and London. (5\/15\/09)<\/p>\n

Warmly, an ‘Arcadia’ That’s Most Calculating<\/a> – Peter Marks at The Washington Post<\/em> reviews the D.C. revival. I imagine that the editor who wrote that headline must be very difficult to understand in conversation. (5\/15\/09)<\/p>\n

Dinner with the FT: Sir Tom Stoppard<\/a> – Illuminating conversation covering the London revival of Arcadia<\/em> and Stoppard’s adaptation of Chekhov. Plus you get to find out what they spent on the meal.(5\/15\/09)<\/p>\n

Books<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Interview: Katherine Dunn<\/a> – I could’ve sworn I posted this AV Club interview with Katherine “Geek Love<\/em>” Dunn before, but I’m not finding any link for it on the site. Oops. (5\/21\/09)<\/p>\n

Outsmarted<\/a> – Another big John Lanchester review\/essay in The New Yorker<\/em> about finance. I’m undecided about reading his new book on the subject, I.O.U.: Why Everyone Owes Everyone and No One Can Pay<\/a>\"\". (6\/1\/09)<\/p>\n

50 Must-Read Novels from the 20th Century<\/a> – Do you miss that Literary 0-fers<\/a> series I used to post, about authors and series I’ve never read a word of? I was going to use this list for that. Since it has White Noise<\/em> on the list and describes it as “beautifully postmodern,” you don’t really have to subject yourself to this one.<\/p>\n

When Lit Blew Into Bits<\/a> – This was going to be near the center for my Books of the Decade<\/em> post, which got derailed when a pal of mine died unexpectedly. It’s got some neat arguments, even if it neglects to mention that Oscar Wao<\/a>\"\" is a prose hybrid-rewrite of the Hernandez Bros.’ Love & Rockets<\/em> comics. (12\/6\/09)<\/p>\n

Rilke the clay pot<\/a> – I wish I had the stamina to make it through this review of a new translation of Rilke’s poems, a new bio and a collection his correspondence with Lou Andreas-Salom\u00c3\u00a9. Alas, I’m going to delete it after six months. (9\/16\/09)<\/p>\n

The Hack<\/a> – How did Gabriel Garcia Marquez’ time as a journalist affect his prose? Sadly, I don’t care enough to finish the article. (Jan\/Feb 2010)<\/p>\n

Hollywood’s Favorite Cowboy<\/a> – A rare interview with Cormac McCarthy. I don’t dig his work very much, but it’s a fascinating conversation. (11\/20\/09)<\/p>\n

Court of Opinion<\/a> – A New York Magazine<\/em> book club-style discussion of Bill Simmons’ Book of Basketball<\/a>\"\". I quit reading that book after discovering that the Robert Horry writeup consisted of a 3-page reprint of one of Simmons’ columns. Still, it was fun to get other people’s perspectives. (12\/8\/09)<\/p>\n

Movies<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Vulcan: The Soul of Spock<\/a> – A video essay from Matt Zoller Seitz on Spock-As-Othello. (5\/6\/09)<\/p>\n

Zen Pulp: The World of Michael Mann, Pt. 1: Vice Precedent<\/a> – Zoller Seitz also did a series of video essays on Michael Mann’s movies, partly focusing on the idea that Mann is obsessed with work, albeit not in the way that Charlie Kaufman’s scripts all seem to be about work and how it defines us. (7\/1\/09)<\/p>\n

The Ubiquitous Anderson<\/a> – A video essay about the pernicious influence of Wes Anderson, from the prism of Rian Johnson’s movie The Brothers Bloom<\/em>. I haven’t watched this yet and, since I didn’t like The Brothers Bloom very much, probably won’t. (5\/21\/09)<\/p>\n

Quentin Tarantino lists his top films of 2009<\/a> – Star Trek<\/em> was #1, so whatever.(12\/14\/09)<\/p>\n

Bourgeois Surrender<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

A pal of mine from St. John’s has been blogging under that handle for a while. I’ve reposted him from time to time.<\/em><\/p>\n

Music Post<\/a> – I haven’t clicked through all the links to the music and videos. Glad we share an affinity for the Pet Shop Boys. (Gayyyy. . . .) (10\/5\/09)<\/p>\n

Yeats: “Sailing to Byzantium”<\/a> – B.S. is a good reader (and re-reader) of books, plays and poetry, so I’ve saved some of the ones for pieces that I’ve yet to read.<\/p>\n

Shelley: “Ode to the West Wind”<\/a> – I wish I read more poetry. (11\/4\/09)<\/p>\n

Julius Caesar<\/em>: Part I<\/a> and Part II<\/a> – Embarrassingly, I haven’t read Julius Caesar<\/em> yet. I really oughtta get on that. (4\/25\/09 and 5\/1\/09)<\/p>\n

People Must Love a Good Blog Post<\/a> – He covers a couple of subjects, but focuses on Hollywood of the 1970’s, considered via Peter Biskind’s book Easy Riders, Raging Bulls, (or How the Sex, Drugs, and Rock and Roll Generation Saved Hollywood)<\/a>\"\".<\/p>\n

Books in a Digital Age<\/a> – I’m afraid this long Sven Birkerts’ essay will boil down to “books good, internet bad,” but I haven’t read it yet. Given the nature of this post of mine, he’s probably right. (Spring 2010)<\/p>\n

Comics<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Interview: Joe Sacco<\/a> – I’m saving this till I read Sacco’s Footnotes in Gaza<\/a>\"\". (1\/18\/10)<\/p>\n

Preface to Mid-Life Creative Imperatives, Part 1 of 3<\/a> – Springboarding off Jeet Heer’s post<\/a> about what great cartoonists did in their middle-age, Gary Groth recently wrote an epic take on the subject. I think. Approaching 40, I was interested in the topic, but feared I wouldn’t finish reading it before turning 50. (2\/24\/10)<\/p>\n

CR Holiday Interviews #9 (Jeet Heer)<\/a> and #11 (Timothy Hodler)<\/a> – Tom Spurgeon at Comics Reporter published a great series of interviews around the holidays. I pulled a couple of them and keep meaning to go back and read the whole shebang, but I was most interested in checking out these guys, who are both good comics critics. (12\/29\/09 and 12\/31\/09)<\/p>\n

Etc.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

The Architect of 9\/11<\/a> – I haven’t gotten around to reading these posts about Mohamed Atta, and how his architecture background may have influenced his radicalism and his role in 9\/11. (9\/8\/09)<\/p>\n

The Chess Master and the Computer<\/a> – I was gonna tie this Garry Kasparov review into a conversation I had c.1994 about how the changeover to CD and digital recording may have subtly affected the way music was played and recorded. Nowadays, some artists are recording in ways that play to the narrower range of MP3 compression and\/or ringtone speakers, and I’m glad to be vindicated in that. Playing chess against computers changes the way we learn and play chess. (2\/11\/10)<\/p>\n

Ennui Becomes Us<\/a> – A National Interest<\/em> article about how the world’s going to hell or something, as per the second law of thermodynamics. No, seriously: information entropy is behind everything. It’s like Thomas Pynchon c. 1965. (12\/16\/09)<\/p>\n

Seizing the Opportunity to Destroy Western Civilization<\/a> – Speaking of which, World War I was a black swan. (3\/4\/10)<\/p>\n

Edge People<\/a> – The latest installment in Tony Judt’s memoirs, post-ALS. (2\/23\/10)<\/p>\n

The agony of a body artist<\/a> – I’m not sure what I was going to do with this Roger Ebert blog post about performance artist Chris Burden. (10\/14\/09)<\/p>\n

Andy Warhol’s TV<\/a> – I still wanna write about Plimpton and Warhol and celebrity in New York. I’ll probably get some good material out of watching these Warhol TV shows from the ’80’s.(7\/1\/09)<\/p>\n

NYC Grid<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

I love Paul Sahner’s daily photo-essays of New York, one block at a time on NYC Grid<\/a>. But I fell behind last month, and have a couple of them tabbed (as well as a bunch as unread news items).<\/p>\n