Shoot first, add captions later

I don’t have time to resequence and caption these pix, dear readers, but I’m sure you wanna see how today’s mini-coach trip up to The Giant’s Causeway went, so I’ve posted the pix.

In case you don’t wanna see the pix, I’m betting I can change your mind:

Keep in mind: these are natural formations.

Oh, and the backdrop is pretty nice, too:

I’ll get around to reorganizing and captioning during the weekend. Your job is to marvel.

What it is: 2/11/08

It’s the Belfast Special Edition of What it is!

What I’m reading: Exit Ghost by Philip Roth, and A Fan’s Notes, by Frederick Exley

What I’m listening to: District Line, by Bob Mould

What I’m watching: On the flight over to Belfast, I watched Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and The Big Lebowski (more on this later)

What I’m drinking: Guinness. Duh.

Where I’m going: Perhaps I’ll get up to the Giants Causeway today. I’ll definitely be going here on Tuesday.

What I’m happy about: Getting to explore a new place.

What I’m sad about: Being apart from my wife for a few days.

What I’m pondering: Why I didn’t stop to take a picture of the three epically drunk men I saw stumbling down the street on Sunday afternoon, each drinking from what appeared to be two-liter bottles of Strongbow cider.

New day

Made it into Belfast half an hour ahead of schedule, and cruised right out to my hotel. My driver told me that the story I heard about it is true; the Europa is the most bombed hotel in the world. Forty-seven different bombings, he said.

I napped (still can’t sleep on flights), and then meandered around town in the afternoon. I’ll post pix from that later. For now, click through this guy to see some of the gorgeous sunrise photos I took from the plane:

Standard Operating Procedures

I’m off to Belfast tonight for a client visit. Better go over my checklist!

E-check-in, print boarding pass, dig up passport: check

Pack suit, toiletries, walking-around clothes: check

Put together electronics kit, with chargers and international outlet adapter: check

Check battery in noise-canceling headphones, charge iPod and camera: check

Find some reading material downstairs in the library: check and check

Receive e-mail from my father with a joke about a plane crashing:

check

Pack extra Xanax for flight: check

Welcome to the Boomtown

This week’s issue of New York has a cover feature about the impending recession and how it’ll affect NYC:

See? The Boom Is Bust! Plus: The Upside of the Downside and The Everything Guide to Belt-Tightening.

But as I read the issue (it’s really become a great magazine under Adam Moss), I got the feeling that not everyone’s taking this premise seriously. It’s not that the ads were frighteningly inappropriate (not like a few weeks ago, when the cover feature on finding silence and peace in NYC was filled with ads for gyms that tend to, um, pump the megamix) (oh, and Quebec? Try to find a better tagline than “Providing emotions since 1534,” please); rather, it was a certain passage that betrayed New York’s status as a boomtown. That would be Adam Platt’s review of Dovetail, a new restaurant on the Upper West Side, which includes this gem:

As at other destination joints around town, there is a small private dining room downstairs, and if you have the inclination, you can wash your dinner down with a glass or two of ’98 La Tâche Burgundy ($1,840 per bottle) or, even better, a bottle of legendary ’95 Romanée-Conti ($3,700).

Remember, kiddos: the boom is bust! Better buy that $3,700 bottle of wine while you can still afford it!

You be Illy

Ernesto Illy, “evangelist of espresso,” has died at the age of 82. I’ve never been an espresso drinker, although we do have a machine at home (wedding present, naturally). Given his company’s level of QC, I’m thinking of trying it out! (not the pods, of course)

Largely under Ernesto Illy’s direction, the company built a laboratory equipped with sophisticated instruments like gas chromatographs, infrared emission pyrometers and flame ionization detectors. There, coffee beans are cut into slices eight microns thick for analysis in an electron microscope. Every step of the manufacturing process is monitored by computers. There are 114 quality-control checks between the time bags of raw beans arrive on the loading docks to the time roasted beans are shipped in sealed cans.

I love the floridity of this passage:

Disdaining standard-size cups of over-roasted coffee and any sort of added ingredient — particularly milk, which he viewed as a cover-up for badly roasted beans — Mr. Illy saw something sublime in espresso’s vibrant aroma, potent flavor and velvety, hazel-colored head of foam, known as crema in Italian.

I, at the moment, am drinking my afternoon French press of Jamaican Joe’s.

Absent Friends and Comedians

We’ve all been there: one minute you’re looking through the recently assembled Ikea shelves of your library for a paperback copy of Gershom Scholem’s Kabbalah, and the next — BAM! — you stumble across the box containing all your personal correspondence from 1988 until whenever people stopped sending letters.

Surely I’m not the only recording angel in the crowd! There have to be some of you out there who thought all your incoming ephemera needed saving. I’m not the only one who crossed self-fascination with OCD and ended up with a box of Virtual Memories, am I?

Okay, maybe I am. But I really have kept that box of letters, postcards and notes. At some point around the turn of the century, I sorted many of these missives by sender and put them in freezer bags. Now they look like evidence, only there’s no case left to prove, nor even a statute of limitations to consult.

It’s all e-mail nowadays, with the loss of physicality, of handwriting, of torn envelopes, of stamp and cancellation. These letters aren’t just mementos or keepsakes; on one level they’re relics, archaicisms like audio cassettes or floppy disks. The pieces I stumbled across still contain information, but I’m not sure I have the (emotional) tools to read some of them anymore.

* * *

In my previous post, I included links to a few other guys who share my name. I wonder how many old friends and acquaintances have looked me up in recent years, and wondered, “Which way did he go: supply chain executive, trade magazine editor, or NASCAR wannabe?”

It put me in mind of that great monologue from American Splendor, where Harvey Pekar wonders how the Cleveland phone book can have listings for two other people with his name. “This filled me with curiosity. How could there be three people with such an unusual name in the world, let alone in one city?” he asks. After the other two (father and son) died, he says, “Although I’d met neither man, I was filled with sadness. ‘What were they like?’ I thought. It seemed our lives had been linked, in some indefinable way.”

Two years later, another Harvey Pekar appears in the phonebook, prompting his stand-in (Paul Giamatti in a brilliant performance) to ponder, “Who are these people? Where do they come from? What do they do? What’s in a name? Who is Harvey Pekar?”

Looking back almost 20 years, it’s not quite as though some of these letters were written to a different person — I mean, I can still see myself in the rear-view mirror — but remembering my college-persona is almost as embarrassing as remembering my famed Napoleon Dynamite look from those years, because every drama-queen note or letter I received in that period must have been prompted by my own incredibly bizarre behavior. (And my propensity to seek out crazy women.)

Case in point: I came across a note I received from a girl at college. She dramatically lambasted me for being an unfeeling, confusing misanthrope. Now, I’m sure that I could find plenty more letters in the box expressing that exact sentiment, but the problem with this one is, it’s only signed with an initial, and I HAVE NO IDEA WHO IT’S FROM. I’ve read it over a few times and racked my brain to figure out the sender, to whom I held grave importance 18 years ago (during my first semester at Hampshire), but to no avail. It’s a blank.

Sometimes we lose the memory, and sometimes the memory loses us. The letter that saddened me the most was a handmade card from another girl at college, mailed a few months after I graduated. It’s filled with reminiscences, travel plans, charity work, the day-to-day — “Other than my little crusade to save the world, I’m still working at the same cafe/bookstore that I did last summer. . .” — all written in a jaunty, lively hand and decorated with a painting (I’ll post the picture later).

It’s the saddest letter I found because she died a few years later, lost at sea. I can’t remember if I wrote her back, but I hope I did.

* * *

Despite this, I’m actually pretty happy I went through these letters. So many of them are reminders of friends and how our lives began to develop: in our college days, in our first professional years, in our travels. Some of these people are still in my life, while I’ve fallen out of touch with others were once my closest friends. Their names once meant the world to me but, like Billy Joel sang, “So many faces in and out of my life / Some will last, some will just be now-and-then.”

Taking this opportunity to get back in touch with some, I applied a little of the detective work that the internet has made so easy and rekindled one old friendship last week. Gratifyingly, the conversation pretty much picked up where we left off. (But now with 90% less crazy!)

I tried to reach another college pal, but found no trace of her online. I had to call the number at the last known address I had (from one of her letters, of course): her small Kentucky hometown. I spoke to her father, who pleasantly told me, “She’s living in the capital now.”

I paused a moment, then said, “Which is. . . ?”

“Frankfort, of course.”

“Oh, yeah, that’s right.” You learn something every day. He gave me her address and I wrote her a card.

Sure, there are other people that I’m less interested in contacting, or don’t have time to look up, or [insert excuse here] (like, I was a douchebag and that’s why we stopped talking / writing), but even their old letters — cards sent from home during winter holidays, inter-college correspondence from high school friends, short stories sent from semesters abroad — are treasure.

So many lives, I can’t keep them all in my head. I’m glad I have Virtual Memories.

* * *

Today’s the fifth anniversary of the launch of this blog. My thanks go out to everyone who’s visited and read my writing. I know that it’s not the most focused of blogs, and I wish I could write exclusively about a single topic, but I’m afraid it’s not my strength.

More like “F”-mail

Back in the 1990s when Tom Spurgeon was editing The Comics Journal, he was kind enough to publish some of my short comics reviews. Since the irascible publisher of the magazine was named Gary “a man should be judged by the quality of his enemies” Groth, some people thought my byline was actually his nom de plume. This led me to write an About the Contributors note reading, “Gil Roth is not a clever pseudonym for Gary Groth. In fact, he’s not very clever at all.”

More recently, and for the same reason, I was convinced that the “comic” strip Gil Thorp is a bizarre prank targeting me, and only me. (Okay, and him and him.)

But none of these odd connections can top the incredible screwup that took place last week, when a drug company’s outside law-firm accidentally e-mailed secret documents about a government negotiation . . . to a pharma-writer at the New York Times. Portfolio, take it away!

When the New York Times broke the story last week that Eli Lilly & Co. was in confidential settlement talks with the government, angry calls flew behind the scenes as the drug giant’s executives accused federal officials of leaking the information.

As the company’s lawyers began turning over rocks closer to home, however, they discovered what could be called A Nightmare on Email Street, a pharmaceutical consultant told Portfolio.com. One of its outside lawyers at Philadelphia-based Pepper Hamilton had mistakenly emailed confidential information on the talks to Times reporter Alex Berenson instead of Bradford Berenson, her co-counsel at Sidley Austin. . . .

Proving that

  1. the auto-complete function was obviously designed by Satan (or Microsoft)
  2. a man should be judged by the quality of his mistaken identity

(hat tip to Pharmalot and S&A)

(UPDATE: Dammit! I knew this was too good to be true!)