A podcast about books, art & life — not necessarily in that order
I doubt any of these Cold War Soviet video arcade games are as good as Rush’n Attack. (Which couldn’t hold a candle to Contra, of course. I especially liked the level where you had to circumvent a law against federal funding of the secret army. . .)
That said, those commie sonsabitches did develop Tetris, which helped annihilate a generation of American college students.
Phil Spector couldn’t possibly have killed Lana Clarkson! He was busy conducting drug-assays for Merck KgA!
Every summer, when we get rolling on the annual Top 20 Pharma / Top 10 Biopharma report, my trusty associate editor compiles pipeline information for the past year. While I suss out sales figures and try to parse the arcana of accounting, she puts together lists of new drugs that were approved, extensions or new indications for approved drugs, those that are filed and pending approval, those that have lost patent protection, research projects in late-phase or early-phase studies, and those that were canceled or rejected.
That last category, the could-have-beens, is a testament to the enormous risk that drug companies take on. This year’s #1 company, Pfizer, recently had to cancel development of a drug that would have brought in upwards of $50 billion in revenues during its lifecycle. Future revenues are kaput and $1 billion in R&D investment has been flushed away with it.
Fortunately, Michael Moore has a strategy for eliminating this expense and the risk! America needs to regulate drug companies “like utilities since they’re just as important as electricity and water.” That’ll make them more productive and less expensive! Of course!
I mean, outside of the fact that the U.S. power grid is antiquated and prone to collapse, and that the water supply in this house was provided by a well for 35 years, I’d have to say he almost knows what he’s talking about.
I do find it funny when people tell me the pharma industry needs more regulation, and that drugs should be cheaper.
“Gentlemen, our target market is. . . young people who don’t bother paying their bills!”
Apparently, those free-spending youths don’t care much for paying their cell-phone bills. A court motion filed on June 4 explains that Amp’d “experienced an unprecedented growth of subscribers” between November, 2006, and February after running ads on MTV about the wireless phone company’s lineup of mobile music and video content.
Collecting payments from these subscribers proved to be a challenge, however. “Approximately 90% of the debtor’s customers were on 18-month service contracts,” according to the filing. “The debtor began to find a host of credit and collections problems (that) contributed ultimately to a liquidity crisis.” By May, the number of nonpaying customers reached 80,000. That’s nearly half of Amp’d’s current customer base of 175,000 subscribers.
Funnily enough, the writer doesn’t quite the grok the contradiction in the following statement:
Here’s why Verizon may want to pick up Amp’d on the cheap: Amp’d has been exceptionally successful in getting its subscribers to use data services, which are expected to become the wireless industry’s growth engine in the coming years. In the first quarter of 2007, Amp’d users downloaded twice as many videos, songs, and games as in the fourth quarter of 2006.
Which sounds great, except their customers didn’t bother paying their bills!
Fake Chinese brands. Or, as they put it: CNOVESRE!
Those of you who have come out to Stately VM Estates may think that Amy & I live out in the sticks. I go to some lengths to point out that, no matter how isolated my town is, it’s nowhere near as bad as the next town over, West Milford. And now I have proof.
Two YouTube-related e-mails from overseas friends were in my in-box this morning:
Faiz let me know that there’s a promo video for his children’s book, while Tina sent me videos of her friend’s band, Anal Traffic.
I post, you decide. Or something like that.
Here’s a neat article about how wine overtook beer in America:
Meanwhile, the American middle classes have fast become connoisseurs of everything — coffee, ’80s Japanese garage-rock bands, environmentalist toilet paper. Now, Americans who want the exclusivity that connoisseurship offers but didn’t want to seem like snobs can have it both ways. Beer’s approachability became less of a virtue. Ironically, in the ultimate about-face, craft-brew drinkers lifted the language of wine. (Tasting notes for a pale ale from the Web site BeerAdvocate: “Nose is floral, like orange blossoms, with some citric rind and soft apple.”)
As someone who refers to himself as a “gin snob” (among other examples of my snobbishness), I can see what he means.
So, are you more of a wine drinker or a beer drinker? (excluded from this question: my teetotaling family and my recovering alcoholic exes)
Here’s an article about how Perseus Books Group is closing down two of its imprints: Carroll & Graf and Thunder’s Mouth Press. The further away I get from my indie-publishing days, the less I can understand how any of them stay afloat. This passage summed up how I tried to see things back then:
“When you see the book world conglomeratizing, it can only mean less diversity of voices,” said Johnny Temple, publisher of Akashic Books, a Brooklyn-based imprint distributed by Perseus. “When I sign up a book, it matters more that I love it than that I’ve identified a good marketing niche for it. That’s the real essence of independent publishing — it’s not a deal, it’s supposed to be a labor of love.”
Then I lost the love.
I hope the founders of those presses got a decent purchase price when they joined up with Avalon Publishing (which was later acquired by Perseus), but I have a feeling that I can see where the “labor of love” part collided with the “good marketing niche” part:
“At Carroll & Graf, we bridged the gap between small, lesser-known presses and the larger houses when it comes to gay literature,” said Don Weise, a senior editor who is losing his job. “In the four years that I’ve been here, I’ve acquired more than 100 books, and no one has ever told me no, I couldn’t do that. In the book world, that’s unheard of.”
I probably would’ve moved his attribution, along with the “senior editor who is losing his job” part to the end of the paragraph, to make my point.