Is today’s Housebroken the most racist (racistest?) comic strip ever?
(Hey, CR readers! Stick around! Plumb the depths of the Unrequired Reading archives . . . if you dare!)
A podcast about books, art & life — not necessarily in that order
Is today’s Housebroken the most racist (racistest?) comic strip ever?
(Hey, CR readers! Stick around! Plumb the depths of the Unrequired Reading archives . . . if you dare!)
One of my friends wrote me about yesterday’s Middlemarch post, essentially smacking me down for sounding like I “don’t want to be bothered getting into another time and place, which is something that most people think that novels do.”
Guilty! As I hit the “publish” button, I felt that this post came off as a whine, rather than the argument I wanted to make about living at hyperspeed and how difficult it is to slow down. If anything, I wasn’t trying to get into the merits or specifics of Middlemarch: only 125 pages in, I wasn’t in a position to judge it.
Living at hyperspeed, I was stuck for time. Given more of it, I would’ve contrasted the experience of reading a book like this with the experience I had reading Spook Country, an entertaining thriller that felt like it was made of now. Its McGuffin is pretty easy to suss out, unfortunately, but I enjoyed the book probably because of its utter now-ness.
What I was trying to say about Middlemarch, on the other hand, wasn’t that the particular time and place are like a foreign country (nor one that I’m disinclined to visit), but rather that the very experience of reading that novel is like a foreign country (or maybe one I was raised in as a child but forgot about).
Given my tendency not to extrapolate from my own experiences and tastes, I should’ve concluded that this is merely a symptom of my middle-aged shallowness, especially as the past 3-4 months’ workload has left me frazzled and constantly dealing with crises.
Humorously enough, the chapter I read last night begins with this passage about . . . how times are faster “now” and there’s less leisure:
A great historian, as he insisted on calling himself, who had the happiness to be dead a hundred and twenty years ago, and so to take his place among the colossi whose huge legs our living pettiness is observed to walk under, glories in his copious remarks and digressions as the least imitable part of his work, and especially in those initial chapters to the successive books of his history, where he seems to bring his arm-chair to the proscenium and chat with us in all the lusty ease of his fine English. But Fielding lived when the days were longer (for time, like money, is measured by our needs), when summer afternoons were spacious, and the clock ticked slowly in winter evenings. We belated historians must not linger after his example; and if we did so, it is probably that our chat would be thin and eager, as if delivered from a camp-stool in a parrot house. I at least have so much to do in unravelling certain human lots, and seeing how they were woven and interwoven, that all the light I can command must be concentrated on this particular web, and not dispersed over that tempting range of relevancies called the universe.
Before a trip, I usually find myself downstairs in our library, looking at 1,200-odd books and trying to figure out how much reading time I’ll have, what mood I’ll be in during the trip, how much weight I’m willing to carry in my bag, and what book will make me look unapproachably smart in the terminal and on the plane. This time around, I was too harried to think straight, and so, last week in Milan, I got stuck without a book.
This almost never happens to me. I knew there would be plenty of time to read on this trip, but I foolishly brought along only a brief (350 pages) novel I was halfway through (Spook Country) and a 110-page play (Rock n Roll), both of which I wrapped up by the second day of the trip. It was time to employ The Eco Strategy.
Unfortunately, the first two bookstores I checked out had no English-language section. Since I was on conference-schedule from then on, there was no time to look up and visit a specialty store (Amy sez there was one over by Castello Sforzesco).
I stopped in at one near our hotel and discovered a very small Inglese shelf. The books were mostly UK Penguin editions, and the most contemporary writer on the shelf was Beckett. So I found myself studying a collection of classics to figure out what the heck could occupy me for the rest of the trip and the 8-hour flight home.
I considered picking up Nostromo, but thought, “That book killed David Lean; there’s no way I’m going to make it.”
Trollope? I wouldn’t know where to start.
Bleak House? My cheap-ass stereotype kicked in, as I picked up a new copy a year or so ago, in the hopes of re-reading it.
A Room of One’s Own? Tried it on three different occasions and never got into it. (Tried reading Mrs. Dalloway twice: same result.)
F. Scott Fitzgerald? I’d be back in the same bookless boat a day or so later.
Then it hit me: Middlemarch! Sure, I had a copy at home, but it was mass-market paperback, and this edition was larger and more readable (I’m getting old, and mass-market typesetting is beyond my eyesight).
I started Middlemarch once back in college, but got derailed due to some piddling matter like coursework. But now it would be the only book in my possession! I’d be sure to get so far into it that I wouldn’t just bail partway through! Plus, it would make me look smart and out of step with the times! The back-cover blurb was from Henry James, fergoshsakes!
From the first chapter, as George Eliot relates the marriage prospects and religious tendencies of Dorothea Brooke, I got to thinking about the nature of sprawling novels like this one. Over its 800 pages, the book attempts to canvas the interweaving lives and classes of a town in 1832 England. I wondered how contemporary readers — outside of academia, that is — would devote themselves to this sort of project. Do people have the patience to read a book like this one? I find it charming in parts, and possessed of enough tension and engaging characters to outweigh the archaicness of some of the language.
But I also find myself facing a variant on the suspension-of-disbelief: that is, I feel as if I have to slow down, to reframe my perceptions to an era in which communications were slower and religious and ideological debates were of a different stripe. That’s not to say that it’s some sorta relic. Dorothea’s zealotry, Casaubon’s arm’s-length distance from the world, Fred’s slacker college-kid are all vivid characters and could easily transpose into the present. Still, a novel like this requires a different way of thinking than that to which I’ve grown accustomed in these past hyperaccelerated years.
Finishing Book One (about one-eighth of the novel) on the flight home, I felt confident that I could stick with this novel and its pace, that I can slow down from this frenetic pace.
Then I thought, “In eight hours, I’ve probably traveled more miles than George Eliot did in her entire life.”
We’re heading home from Milan this morning, dear readers! Wish us a safe trip and enjoy this week’s links!
Continue reading “Unrequired Reading: Oct. 5, 2007”
My October ish is (just about) done and it’s time to head off to Milan for the CPhI/ICSE conference! Have some Unrequired Reading, my dear unrequired readers!
Continue reading “Unrequired Reading: Sep. 28, 2007”
After work on Tuesday, I headed into NYC to attend my buddy Paul Di Filippo’s reading at the South Street Seaport Museum. It was the kickoff of the 19th season of the New York Review of Science Fiction’s reading series. Paul, who came down from Providence for the event, did a great job with a charming story called “iCity”. It’s about competitive urban planning, the fickleness of public taste, and the use of ‘sensate substrate’ to build just about anything.
I got to the venue about an hour early, so as to avoid traffic from the Yankees game. I meandered around the area and took a couple of pix, but it’s nowhere near as photogenic as the swathes of Toronto we saw this weekend. Talk about urban planning: I don’t really understand the Fulton St. part of the Seaport. See, it’s a quaint, nautically-themed cobblestone street . . . populated by Gap, Talbot’s and Abercrombie & Fitch stores. This stretch is riddled with tourists, which leaves me to figure out exactly why visitors who make the relatively inconvenient jaunt to this part of Manhattan would want to shop at the same stores they have in their own towns: “I can’t believe we’ve come to the famous South Street Seaport all the way from Nebraska! Now let’s get some Pizzeria Uno!”
I guess stores that sell anchors and sailor hats would hardly stay in business, but still. Here’s a picture from out on the pier:
Anyway, as mentioned, Paul’s story was a hoot. Amy — who took the subway over after work — concluded she needs to start reading some of Paul’s collections. We have a bunch of them on the shelves downstairs, along with a novel or two of his, so she’ll have plenty of choices.
During the intermission, we caught up with Paul and his partner Deb Newton, along with SF legend Barry Malzberg and his wife Joyce. We told Paul & Deb that we’ll definitely get up to Providence to see them sometime soon, especially now that we know Tim Horton’s has opened some locations up there.
Then the intermission ended, and our nightmare began.
The second reader for the evening was Norman Spinrad. I’d read Little Heroes, one of his novels, around the end of my high school days (1988/89), shortly before I started keeping this list. I think I learned about him from a mention in Bruce Sterling’s Mirrorshades anthology — which is also where I first read something by Paul — earlier that year.
I don’t recall what Spinrad’s reputation was at that time. I hadn’t heard his name in a bazillion years, but when I saw that he was on the bill with Paul, I was curious as to what he’s been up to. After last night, I’m now curious as to how he’s avoided being beaten to death by angry audiences.
He began by rambling through some unfunny, huckster-riffic spiel about a machine that allows people to program their own dreams. Now, I once described The Triplets of Belleville as “being inside another person’s dreams. Unfortunately, that person is very boring.” But I had no idea how bad it could get.
Spinrad spent the next 40-45 minutes reading us a “G-rated” dream. The ‘dream’ was uninteresting, overlong, rendered in utterly lifeless prose. I’m not making this up: it was about (I think) a crippled girl at a prom, who transforms into a butterfly, a hummingbird, a raven, a condor, some sorta flying bicycle person, a dragon, and sweetJesusItotallylosttrack. It was narrated in the second person, which made it sorta like Bright Lights, Big City, except even less fun and without the cocaine.
I mean, I give myself credit for sticking with it as long as I did. Virtually the entire crowd of two dozen was . . . despondent. We weren’t exactly slack-jawed with disbelief. I mean, sure, that was part of it. But the sheer length of the reading meant that we recovered from the tension that accompanies shock — even the shock of badness — and headed on into stultification. His only bit of dialogue, some rhyming by a wise old black woman, would have been offensive if we were left capable of ire.
The interminability of it all grew to the point at which an older member of the audience with some sorta Parkinsonian tremor actually stopped trembling. We assumed — okay, hoped — he’d just fallen asleep. I looked around to see if anyone was “into” the performance, but we were in the back row and all I saw were slack shoulders, and some heads hanging low. One guy was bouncing his head off the back of the chair in front of him.
We were a million miles from iCity.
But this didn’t stop our intrepid reader, who continued to relate this never-ending mess of prose. At some point in the reading, I sent a text message to Amy’s phone that read, “At least we have each other.” On the way back to the car, she likened the experience to an undergraduate creative writing class, remarking, “Just because you think your dreams are interesting, it doesn’t mean anyone else should have to suffer through them.” I pointed out that I recently blogged about dreaming of eight-dollar bills, but she thought that was funny.
When Spinrad finished/stopped, I didn’t know how to react. To applaud would signal that we knew the reading was over, but it could also give him encouragement and leave him thinking that this inane, boring ramble was somehow good. Most members of the audience began applauding, but even then the nightmare wouldn’t end.
No, the host of the evening, Jim Freund, politely commented on dreams as Spinrad walked away from the podium. This was enough to start the man pontificating about what he’s “trying to do” with this writing, exploring the “nature of dreams” or somesuch. Spinrad rambled on about lucid dreaming for a while, then headed back to the podium and said, “Can I tell a story?”
Amy quietly said, “Um, no. You proved that already.”
It was late by the time Spinrad got done explaining how an editor objected to his use of the second person. “He told me, ‘You can’t write in the second person!'”
I followed Amy’s lead and muttered, “I’m not so sure you can handle the first or third person, either.”
We had to head back to NJ, even though I would’ve liked to spend some more time with Paul & Deb. I suppose now we’ll have to get up there. Might even stay overnight, if it means we can score some of that Timmy’s coffee the next morning.
Anyway, you were a good sport for putting up with this whole darn thing. The lesson is, if you see Norman Spinrad on the bill for a reading, run in the other direction. Or kick him in the nuts.
Oh, and here’s another picture, from Water St.:
(Note: none of this should imply that older writers are batshit coots who should be avoided. As exhibit A, I offer up one of my first-ever posts, about a mindblowing reading by William Gass at the 92nd St. Y.)
Here are some not-necessarily-Labor Day-themed links, dear readers! Enjoy!
Continue reading “Unrequired Reading: Aug. 31, 2007”
I noticed in college that the more books I had in my dorm room, the fewer questions visitors would ask me about literature. So, in the never-ending quest to cover up my intellectual inadequacies, I keep lots and lots of books around.
Since I get far fewer visitors at home than I do on my site, I post things like All The Books I’ve Finished Since 1989 and Books On My Nightstand (most of which have not been there since 1989, although I still use the alarm clock I got from a girlfriend back in 1994) to keep people from asking about my literary interests.
This weekend, I discovered yet another great way of keeping any of you from asking me about my literary interests! It’s a website called LibraryThing and I just used it to upload a complete list of all the books I own.
I already have a database of all the books in my library downstairs (we need to figure out more shelf space, so we can unpack more of Amy’s books), thanks to the fantastic Delicious Library program, which uses my computer’s camera to scan the bar codes of my books and search them out on Amazon. LibraryThing is capable of using DL’s export file to reconstitute that library on the website.
LibraryThing looks to be a neat type of social networking site. It’s not exactly a Myspace for nerds, but it looks to be a pretty neat tool for finding other people who’ve read the same obscure books you have.
Anyway, go check out the site (and my library). It’s free to upload as many as 200 books in year, or $10/year or $25/lifetime for unlimited uploading. I sprung for the lifetime membership because my geekiness is worth it. For fun, click on the “Books In My Library” item in the sidebar on the right side of this page; it’ll open a random selection of five books from my library.
Just don’t ask me which ones I’ve read.